ATRN (African Tax Research Network)

Scientific Committee Feedback Questionnaire

Dear Member of the ATRN Scientific Committee

Thank you for taking part in this survey, evaluating the ATAF/ATRN online paper allocation and review process. We would appreciate if you could complete this Form by giving us your honest and sincere opinion, as this will help us improve the ATRN double-blind peer review

process! Be assured that all answers you provide will be kept in strictest confidentiality.

Please select the rating for each section below based on the following criteria:

5=excellent

4=good

3=average

2=fair

1=poor

SC Survey

I. Scientific Committee Profile (Information)

Gender: *

Level of higher education: *

Type of Organization: *

If Other:

Field of Expertise: *

Years of experience in your field: *

Country of Origin: *

Region: *

II. Kindly rate the Online paper review process

1. User friendliness of the platform: *

2. Sufficient information and instructions to guide the process: *

3. Communication exchange on the platform: *

4. What would you recommend to improve the online paper review process? * (Max 200 words)

III. Kindly rate the Paper allocation process

1. Matching research paper (s) and area of expertise of reviewer: *

2. Quality of research paper (s) allocated to reviewer: *

3. What would you recommend to improve the paper allocation process? * (Max 200 words)

IV. Kindly rate the Marking Rubric

1. Adequacy of the content of the Marking Rubric: *

2. Adequacy of the marks allocated in the rubric: *

3. What would you recommend to improve the Marking Rubric: * (Max 200 words)

V. Kindly rate your personal Experience as ATRN reviewer

1. Your experience as a ATRN member of the SC: *

2. Ability to review research papers allocated to you: *

3. Your knowledge of the research paper(s) subject matter: *

4. The communication with the ATRN team: *

5. Assistance received from the ATRN team: *

VI. General Comments

1. What did you most like about being a reviewer? * (Max 200 words)

2. In your opinion, what went well on the paper review process? * (Max 200 words)

3. In your opinion, what went wrong? * (Max 200 words)

4. What should be the ideal time allocated to review a research paper of up to 8000 words (+/- 25 pages)? * (Max 200 words)

5. What can be improved with regards to the overall paper review process?*

6. Would you recommend someone to become a member of the ATRN Scientific Committee?*

Any other comments:

We would appreciate if you could recommend further people to be contacted, who could

form part of the Scientific Committee.

Scientific Committee Feedback Questionnaire

SC Survey

SC Database recommendation

Quick Links

Follow Us